Evidence Quiz

Indian Evidence Act applies to

‘A’ sues ‘B’ for a libel imputing disgraceful conduct to ‘A’. ‘B’ affirms that the matter alleged to be libelous is true. The position and relations of the parties at the time when the libel was published may be relevant:

X is tired for committing murder of Y by administering poison. The fact that before Y’s death, X purchased similar poison is relevant because

In which of the following illustrations, the fact is irrelevant as evidence?

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists:
List-I List-II
A. Confession caused by inducement, threat, promise 1. Aghnoo Nagesia v. State

B. Confession to a Customers officer 2. State of Punjab v. Barkatram

C. Confession in the F.I.R. given by the accused 3. Pyarelal Bhargava v.State of Rajasthan

D. Discovery of a fact pursuant to a statement in police custody 4. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad

In which of the following cases it was held that Section 27 of the Evidence Act is an exception to Sections 24, 25 and 26?

The Evidence Act provides for exception to the hear-say rule under

“Science of identifying thumb impression is an exact science and does not admit of any mistake or doubt.”
It was held in case of

The father of accused did not support the prosecution during the trial that he told the witness that his son (accused) had committed the murder. The statement of the witness would be in the nature of

Where a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of five, how many of them need to be proved?